You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
CindyJS Plugins
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 40 |
Book title |
Mathematical Software – ICMS 2016
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-42432-3_40 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-942431-6, 978-3-31-942432-3
|
Authors |
Martin von Gagern, Jürgen Richter-Gebert, von Gagern, Martin, Richter-Gebert, Jürgen |
Editors |
Gert-Martin Greuel, Thorsten Koch, Peter Paule, Andrew Sommese |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,727,130
of 25,839,971 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,558
of 8,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,986
of 372,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#118
of 392 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,839,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 392 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.