↓ Skip to main content

Clinical, Biological and Molecular Aspects of COVID-19

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Endothelial Dysfunction as a Primary Consequence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Endothelial Dysfunction as a Primary Consequence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
Chapter number 3
Book title
Clinical, Biological and Molecular Aspects of COVID-19
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, March 2021
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-59261-5_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-059260-8, 978-3-03-059261-5
Authors

Mezoh, Genevieve, Crowther, Nigel J, Genevieve Mezoh, Nigel J. Crowther, Crowther, Nigel J.

Abstract

A number of different viral species are known to have effects on the endothelium. These include dengue, Ebola, Marburg, Lassa fever, yellow fever and influenza viruses, cytomegalovirus and coronaviruses. There are currently seven human endemic coronaviruses, all of which cause respiratory diseases and bind to receptors found within the endothelium. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that causes the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is highly infectious. Like its predecessor, SARS-CoV, it binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2), which is expressed in many cell types, particularly in the lung, including endothelial cells. The initiation of a cytokine storm by the virus along with infection of endothelial cells leads to apoptosis and structural and functional changes that attenuate vascular integrity in many organs including the lungs, heart, liver and kidney. Endothelial damage also enhances the coagulation pathway leading to thrombus formation in major vessels and capillaries. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 has an adverse outcome for individuals with particular comorbid diseases, e.g. hypertension, obesity, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. It is possible that this is due to the presence of pre-existing endothelial dysfunction and systemic inflammation in subjects with these diseases. Therapies for COVID-19 that target the endothelium, the inflammatory response and the coagulation pathway are currently under trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Librarian 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 37 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 39 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2023.
All research outputs
#18,423,411
of 23,655,983 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,185
of 5,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,364
of 421,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#86
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,655,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.