↓ Skip to main content

Clinical, Biological and Molecular Aspects of COVID-19

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: The Immune Response and Effectiveness of COVID-19 Therapies
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Immune Response and Effectiveness of COVID-19 Therapies
Book title
Clinical, Biological and Molecular Aspects of COVID-19
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, March 2021
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-59261-5_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-059260-8, 978-3-03-059261-5
Authors

Tavasolian, Fataneh, Hatam, Gholam Reza, Mosawi, Sayed Hussain, Saadi, Mahdiyar Iravani, Abdollahi, Elham, Jamialahmadi, Tannaz, Sathyapalan, Thozhukat, Sahebkar, Amirhossein, Fataneh Tavasolian, Gholam Reza Hatam, Sayed Hussain Mosawi, Mahdiyar Iravani Saadi, Elham Abdollahi, Tannaz Jamialahmadi, Thozhukat Sathyapalan, Amirhossein Sahebkar

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is highly pathogenic with relatively high mortality and morbidity. In addition to pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and microembolic disorder, a high proportion of patients with SARS-CoV-2 develop lymphopenia and cytokine storm disorder. This review explores the underlying mechanisms behind the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2, especially the immune mechanisms, which could be potentially used as therapeutic targets for the management of COVID-19.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 18 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 16 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,216,302
of 23,285,523 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#690
of 4,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,553
of 420,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#19
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,285,523 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.