↓ Skip to main content

Clinical, Biological and Molecular Aspects of COVID-19

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and COVID-19: A Scoping Review and Meta-analysis
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and COVID-19: A Scoping Review and Meta-analysis
Book title
Clinical, Biological and Molecular Aspects of COVID-19
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, March 2021
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-59261-5_18
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-059260-8, 978-3-03-059261-5
Authors

Jafari-Oori, Mehdi, Ghasemifard, Fatemeh, Ebadi, Abbas, Karimi, Leila, Rahimi-Bashar, Farshid, Jamialahmadi, Tannaz, Guest, Paul C, Vahedian-Azimi, Amir, Sahebkar, Amirhossein, Mehdi Jafari-Oori, Fatemeh Ghasemifard, Abbas Ebadi, Leila Karimi, Farshid Rahimi-Bashar, Tannaz Jamialahmadi, Paul C. Guest, Amir Vahedian-Azimi, Amirhossein Sahebkar, Guest, Paul C.

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a fatal complication of the new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), which causes COVID-19 disease. This scoping review was carried out with international, peer-reviewed research studies and gray literature published up to July 2020 in Persian and English languages. Using keywords derived from MESH, databases including Magiran, IranMedex, SID, Web of Sciences, PubMed, Embase via Ovid, Science Direct, and Google Scholar were searched. After screening titles and abstracts, the full texts of selected articles were evaluated, and those which passed the criteria were analyzed and synthesized with inductive thematic analysis. Study quality was also evaluated using a standard tool. The overall prevalence of ARDS was estimated using a random-effects model. This led to identification of 23 primary studies involving 2880 COVID-19 patients. All articles were observational with a cross-sectional, retrospective, case report, and cohort design with moderate to strong quality. The main findings showed that COVID-19-related ARDS has a high prevalence and is different to ARDS due to other etiologies. Elderly and patients with comorbidities and organ failure should be closely surveyed for respiratory organ indications for several weeks after the onset of respiratory symptoms. There is currently no definitive treatment for ARDS in COVID-19 disease, and supportive therapies and their effects are somewhat controversial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 25 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 24 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,137,999
of 23,285,523 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#511
of 4,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,444
of 420,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#8
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,285,523 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.