↓ Skip to main content

Clinical, Biological and Molecular Aspects of COVID-19

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: A Systematic Review of the Assessment of the Presence of SARS-CoV-2 in Human Semen
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Systematic Review of the Assessment of the Presence of SARS-CoV-2 in Human Semen
Book title
Clinical, Biological and Molecular Aspects of COVID-19
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, March 2021
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-59261-5_30
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-059260-8, 978-3-03-059261-5
Authors

Vahedian-Azimi, Amir, Karimi, Leila, Makvandi, Somayeh, Jamialahmadi, Tannaz, Sahebkar, Amirhossein, Amir Vahedian-Azimi, Leila Karimi, Somayeh Makvandi, Tannaz Jamialahmadi, Amirhossein Sahebkar

Abstract

Theoretically, human testes are highly expressive organs for angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the SARS-CoV-2 receptor. This study aimed to investigate whether the causative agent of COVID-19 is found in semen. The databases of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched using a combination of related keywords. All studies with original data, involving detection of SARS-CoV-2 in semen of male patients with COVID-19 or in those who have recovered from it, were included in the study. Six articles, including 136 samples, entered the systematic review. Most of the studies were performed in the recovery phase of COVID-19. In four articles, SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in semen, while in the other two articles semen testing showed the presence of the virus in some samples. Testicular discomfort, testicular cell damage, and spermogram disruption were also reported in some studies. We conclude that the study question cannot be answered with this number of studies. Since most of the samples were mild to moderate forms of COVID-19, it is not yet clear what the presence of the virus in semen will be in severe cases. The long-term effects are also vague. More original articles with better design and in different phases of the disease are needed to draw robust conclusions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 12 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 15 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,890,275
of 23,900,102 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#638
of 5,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,107
of 422,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#14
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,900,102 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.