You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Marine Genomics
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 14 |
| Book title |
Marine Genomics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3774-5_14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3772-1, 978-1-4939-3774-5
|
| Authors |
Leray, Matthieu, Haenel, Quiterie, Bourlat, Sarah J, Matthieu Leray, Quiterie Haenel, Sarah J. Bourlat |
| Editors |
Sarah J. Bourlat |
| Abstract |
Amplicon-based studies of marine microscopic eukaryotes, also referred to as metabarcoding studies, can be performed to analyze patterns of biodiversity or predator-prey interactions targeting the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 (CO1) or the small ribosomal subunit (SSU) markers. Because high-throughput sequencing (HTS) Illumina platforms provide millions of reads per run, hundreds of samples may be sequenced simultaneously. This protocol details the preparation of multiplexed amplicon libraries for Illumina MiSeq sequencing. We describe a strategy for sample multiplexing using a combination of tailed PCR primers and ligation of indexed adapters. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 23% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2018.
All research outputs
#13,985,864
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,940
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,670
of 393,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#386
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.