You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Marine Genomics
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 8 |
Book title |
Marine Genomics
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3774-5_8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3772-1, 978-1-4939-3774-5
|
Authors |
Mahon, Andrew R, Jerde, Christopher L, Andrew R. Mahon, Christopher L. Jerde |
Editors |
Sarah J. Bourlat |
Abstract |
The method employed for environmental DNA (eDNA) surveillance for detection and monitoring of rare species in aquatic systems has evolved dramatically since its first large-scale applications. Both active (targeted) and passive (total diversity) surveillance methods provide helpful information for management groups, but each has a suite of techniques that necessitate proper equipment training and use. The protocols described in this chapter represent some of the latest iterations in eDNA surveillance being applied in aquatic and marine systems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 42 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 27% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 36% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 20% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 18% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,355,276
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,209
of 14,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,333
of 401,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#372
of 1,466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.