↓ Skip to main content

New methods in the diagnosis of impotence: RigiScan® penile tumescence and rigidity monitoring and diagnostic papaverine hydrochloride injection

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Urology, August 1987
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New methods in the diagnosis of impotence: RigiScan® penile tumescence and rigidity monitoring and diagnostic papaverine hydrochloride injection
Published in
World Journal of Urology, August 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf00326827
Authors

A. A. G. M. Giesbers, J. L. Bruins, A. E. J. L. Kramer, U. Jonas

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,887,212
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#603
of 2,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,124
of 12,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them