You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Exploiting Vagueness for Multi-agent Consensus
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 5 |
| Book title |
Multi-agent and Complex Systems
|
| Published in |
arXiv, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-981-10-2564-8_5 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-9-81-102563-1, 978-9-81-102564-8
|
| Authors |
Michael Crosscombe, Jonathan Lawry, Crosscombe, Michael, Lawry, Jonathan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 38% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 31% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 25% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,811,101
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#440,554
of 939,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,433
of 420,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#8,686
of 16,541 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 939,623 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16,541 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.