↓ Skip to main content

Applications of MALDI-TOF Spectroscopy

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 366: MALDI Mass Spectrometry for Nucleic Acid Analysis.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
MALDI Mass Spectrometry for Nucleic Acid Analysis.
Chapter number 366
Book title
Applications of MALDI-TOF Spectroscopy
Published in
Topics in current chemistry, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/128_2012_366
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-235664-3, 978-3-64-235665-0
Authors

Xiang Gao, Boon-Huan Tan, Richard J. Sugrue, Kai Tang, Gao, Xiang, Tan, Boon-Huan, Sugrue, Richard J., Tang, Kai

Abstract

With the discovery of several matrices which enable the ionization of DNA and RNA, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) has become a powerful platform for the study of nucleic acid sequence changes (e.g., mutations, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertion/deletion, alternative splicing, etc.), amount changes (e.g., copy number variation, gene expression, allele expression, etc.), as well as modifications (e.g., methylation of genomic DNA, post transcriptional modification of tRNAs and rRNAs). Two major strategies have been employed to characterize these changes. Primer extension reactions are designed for genotyping of known polymorphic sites and determining the levels of gene or allele expressions. Base-specific cleavage reactions are used for discovery of unknown polymorphisms and characterization of modifications. These two assays usually generate nucleic acid fragments less than 30 bases in length, which is the ideal mass range for MALDI-MS. Here we review the basic concepts of these assays, sample analysis techniques, and their applications published in recent years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 28%
Researcher 5 20%
Other 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Engineering 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2012.
All research outputs
#18,316,001
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Topics in current chemistry
#117
of 148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,758
of 172,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Topics in current chemistry
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 148 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.