↓ Skip to main content

Implementing Archaeological Time Periods Using CIDOC CRM and SKOS

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Implementing Archaeological Time Periods Using CIDOC CRM and SKOS'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 The Semantic Web: Research and Applications
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Mobile Semantic-Based Matchmaking: A Fuzzy DL Approach
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Replication and Versioning of Partial RDF Graphs
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Finding Your Way through the Rijksmuseum with an Adaptive Mobile Museum Guide
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 A Hybrid Model and Computing Platform for Spatio-semantic Trajectories
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Reactive Policies for the Semantic Web
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Categorize by: Deductive Aggregation of Semantic Web Query Results
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Natural Language Interfaces to Ontologies: Combining Syntactic Analysis and Ontology-Based Lookup through the User Interaction
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 GeoWordNet: A Resource for Geo-spatial Applications
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Assessing the Safety of Knowledge Patterns in OWL Ontologies
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Entity Reference Resolution via Spreading Activation on RDF-Graphs
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 A Generic Approach for Correcting Access Restrictions to a Consequence
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 The Semantic Web: Research and Applications
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Aligning Large SKOS-Like Vocabularies: Two Case Studies
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 OWL Reasoning with WebPIE: Calculating the Closure of 100 Billion Triples
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Efficiently Joining Group Patterns in SPARQL Queries
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Reasoning-Based Patient Classification for Enhanced Medical Image Annotation
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Facilitating Dialogue - Using Semantic Web Technology for eParticipation
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Implementing Archaeological Time Periods Using CIDOC CRM and SKOS
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Facet Graphs: Complex Semantic Querying Made Easy
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Interactive Relationship Discovery via the Semantic Web
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Put in Your Postcode, Out Comes the Data: A Case Study
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Taking OWL to Athens
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Generating Innovation with Semantically Enabled TasLab Portal
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 The Semantic Web: Research and Applications
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 A Pragmatic Approach to Semantic Repositories Benchmarking
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 A Web-Based Repository Service for Vocabularies and Alignments in the Cultural Heritage Domain
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Ontology Management in an Event-Triggered Knowledge Network
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Modeling and Querying Metadata in the Semantic Sensor Web: The Model stRDF and the Query Language stSPARQL
Attention for Chapter 25: The Semantic Web: Research and Applications
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Semantic Web: Research and Applications
Chapter number 25
Book title
The Semantic Web: Research and Applications
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-13486-9_25
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-213485-2, 978-3-64-213486-9
Authors

Andrei Tamilin, Bernardo Magnini, Luciano Serafini, Christian Girardi, Mathew Joseph, Roberto Zanoli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 8%
Netherlands 1 8%
Austria 1 8%
Unknown 9 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 42%
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 7 58%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2010.
All research outputs
#15,380,162
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#4,648
of 8,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,924
of 96,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#23
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.