↓ Skip to main content

Airborne spread of SARS-CoV-2 while using high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy: myth or reality?

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
64 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Airborne spread of SARS-CoV-2 while using high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy: myth or reality?
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2020
DOI 10.1007/s00134-020-06314-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Haymet, Gianluigi Li Bassi, John F. Fraser

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 15%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Master 6 8%
Professor 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 29 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 31 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,144,538
of 25,081,285 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,043
of 5,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,396
of 423,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#56
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,081,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.