↓ Skip to main content

Airborne spread of SARS-CoV-2 while using high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy: myth or reality?

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
67 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Airborne spread of SARS-CoV-2 while using high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy: myth or reality?
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2020
DOI 10.1007/s00134-020-06314-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Haymet, Gianluigi Li Bassi, John F. Fraser

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 25%
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2020.
All research outputs
#639,019
of 17,083,063 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#512
of 4,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,979
of 382,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#57
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,083,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.