Title |
Airborne spread of SARS-CoV-2 while using high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy: myth or reality?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-020-06314-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew Haymet, Gianluigi Li Bassi, John F. Fraser |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
Italy | 4 | 6% |
Spain | 4 | 6% |
Peru | 3 | 5% |
Colombia | 3 | 5% |
Mexico | 3 | 5% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Chile | 2 | 3% |
India | 2 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Unknown | 27 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 43 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 19% |
Scientists | 8 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 12 | 15% |
Researcher | 12 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Professor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 29 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 49% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 31 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,144,538
of 25,081,285 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,043
of 5,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,396
of 423,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#56
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,081,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.