↓ Skip to main content

Structural Genomics

Overview of attention for book
Structural Genomics
Springer US
Attention for Chapter: State-of-the-Art Data Management: Improving the Reproducibility, Consistency, and Traceability of Structural Biology and in Vitro Biochemical Experiments
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
State-of-the-Art Data Management: Improving the Reproducibility, Consistency, and Traceability of Structural Biology and in Vitro Biochemical Experiments
Book title
Structural Genomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, October 2020
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-0892-0_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-160891-3, 978-1-07-160892-0
Authors

David R. Cooper, Marek Grabowski, Matthew D. Zimmerman, Przemyslaw J. Porebski, Ivan G. Shabalin, Magdalena Woinska, Marcin J. Domagalski, Heping Zheng, Piotr Sroka, Marcin Cymborowski, Mateusz P. Czub, Ewa Niedzialkowska, Barat S. Venkataramany, Tomasz Osinski, Zbigniew Fratczak, Jacek Bajor, Juliusz Gonera, Elizabeth MacLean, Kamila Wojciechowska, Krzysztof Konina, Wojciech Wajerowicz, Maksymilian Chruszcz, Wladek Minor, Cooper, David R., Grabowski, Marek, Zimmerman, Matthew D., Porebski, Przemyslaw J., Shabalin, Ivan G., Woinska, Magdalena, Domagalski, Marcin J., Zheng, Heping, Sroka, Piotr, Cymborowski, Marcin, Czub, Mateusz P., Niedzialkowska, Ewa, Venkataramany, Barat S., Osinski, Tomasz, Fratczak, Zbigniew, Bajor, Jacek, Gonera, Juliusz, MacLean, Elizabeth, Wojciechowska, Kamila, Konina, Krzysztof, Wajerowicz, Wojciech, Chruszcz, Maksymilian, Minor, Wladek

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 27%
Student > Master 4 15%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,381,966
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,239
of 13,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,156
of 420,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#22
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,319 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.