You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
High-Dimensional Flow Cytometry Analysis of Regulatory Receptors on Human T Cells, NK Cells, and NKT Cells
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 14 |
Book title |
Translational Bioinformatics for Therapeutic Development
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-0849-4_14 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-160848-7, 978-1-07-160849-4
|
Authors |
Ryosuke Nakagawa, Jason Brayer, Nicole Restrepo, James J. Mulé, Adam W. Mailloux, Nakagawa, Ryosuke, Brayer, Jason, Restrepo, Nicole, Mulé, James J., Mailloux, Adam W. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 57% |
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 20% |
Researcher | 2 | 20% |
Librarian | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 30% |
Unspecified | 2 | 20% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,375,268
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,239
of 13,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,865
of 402,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#24
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,317 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.