↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Radio-Oncology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: Molecular Radio-Oncology
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Molecular Radio-Oncology
Chapter number 10
Book title
Molecular Radio-Oncology
Published in
Recent results in cancer research Fortschritte der Krebsforschung Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-49651-0_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-66-249649-7, 978-3-66-249651-0
Authors

Zschaeck, Sebastian, Steinbach, Jörg, Troost, Esther G C, Sebastian Zschaeck, Jörg Steinbach, Esther G.C. Troost, Troost, Esther G.C.

Abstract

Tumour hypoxia is a well-known negative prognostic marker in almost all solid tumours. [18F]Fluoromisonidazole (FMISO)-positron emission tomography (PET) is a non-invasive method to detect tumour hypoxia. Compared to other methods of hypoxia assessment it possesses some considerable advantages: It is non-invasive, it delivers spatial information on the hypoxia distribution within the entire tumour volume, and it can be repeated during the course of radio(chemo)therapy. This chapter briefly describes different methods of hypoxia evaluation and focuses on hypoxia PET imaging, with the most commonly used tracer being FMISO. The preclinical rationale and clinical studies to use FMISO-PET for patient stratification in radiation therapy are discussed as well as possible agents or radiation-dose modifications to overcome hypoxia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 38%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 46%
Psychology 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,239,860
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Recent results in cancer research Fortschritte der Krebsforschung Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer
#53
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,607
of 393,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Recent results in cancer research Fortschritte der Krebsforschung Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.