Medical and Biomedical Updates
Springer International Publishing
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Role of IP3 Receptors in Shaping the Carotid Chemoreceptor Response to Hypoxia But Not to Hypercapnia in the Rat Carotid Body: An Evidence Review
|
|---|---|
| Book title |
Medical and Biomedical Updates
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/5584_2020_561 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-067215-7, 978-3-03-067216-4
|
| Authors |
Anil Mokashi, Arijit Roy, Santhosh M. Baby, Eileen M. Mulligan, Sukhamay Lahiri, Camillo Di Giulio, Mieczyslaw Pokorski, Mokashi, Anil, Roy, Arijit, Baby, Santhosh M., Mulligan, Eileen M., Lahiri, Sukhamay, Di Giulio, Camillo, Pokorski, Mieczyslaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
| Professor | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2020.
All research outputs
#18,076,777
of 23,228,787 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,128
of 4,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,678
of 398,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#46
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,228,787 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.