You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Unmeasured and Unknown Confounders
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 5 |
| Book title |
Applying Quantitative Bias Analysis to Epidemiologic Data
|
| Published in |
Statistics for Biology and Health, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-0-387-87959-8_5 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-0-387-87960-4, 978-0-387-87959-8
|
| Authors |
Timothy L. Lash, Aliza K. Fink, Matthew P. Fox, Lash, Timothy L., Fink, Aliza K., Fox, Matthew P. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 33% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,040,828
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Statistics for Biology and Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,968
of 108,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Statistics for Biology and Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them