↓ Skip to main content

Volume of Distribution is Unaffected by Metabolic Drug–Drug Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacokinetics, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Volume of Distribution is Unaffected by Metabolic Drug–Drug Interactions
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics, July 2020
DOI 10.1007/s40262-020-00926-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jasleen K. Sodhi, Caroline H. Huang, Leslie Z. Benet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Unspecified 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 22%
Unspecified 2 11%
Sports and Recreations 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2020.
All research outputs
#18,074,317
of 23,225,652 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#1,302
of 1,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,023
of 398,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,225,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.