You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
In-field diagnostics using loop-mediated isothermal amplification.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 25 |
| Book title |
Phytoplasma
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-089-2_25 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-088-5, 978-1-62703-089-2
|
| Authors |
Jenny Tomlinson, Tomlinson, Jenny |
| Editors |
Matt Dickinson, Jennifer Hodgetts |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 37% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 42% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 37% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,425,050
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,136
of 14,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,586
of 187,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#8
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,309 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.