↓ Skip to main content

Progress in Cancer Immunotherapy

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Progress in Cancer Immunotherapy
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Progress in Cancer Immunotherapy
Chapter number 2
Book title
Progress in Cancer Immunotherapy
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-7555-7_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-177553-3, 978-9-40-177555-7
Authors

Liu, Ronghua, Luo, Feifei, Liu, Xiaoming, Wang, Luman, Yang, Jiao, Deng, Yuting, Huang, Enyu, Qian, Jiawen, Lu, Zhou, Jiang, Xuechao, Zhang, Dan, Chu, Yiwei, Ronghua Liu, Feifei Luo, Xiaoming Liu, Luman Wang, Jiao Yang, Yuting Deng, Enyu Huang, Jiawen Qian, Zhou Lu, Xuechao Jiang, Dan Zhang, Yiwei Chu

Abstract

Biological response modifiers (BRMs) emerge as a lay of new compounds or approaches used in improving cancer immunotherapy. Evidences highlight that cytokines, Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling, and noncoding RNAs are of crucial roles in modulating antitumor immune response and cancer-related chronic inflammation, and BRMs based on them have been explored. In particular, besides some cytokines like IFN-α and IL-2, several Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists like BCG, MPL, and imiquimod are also licensed to be used in patients with several malignancies nowadays, and the first artificial small noncoding RNA (microRNA) mimic, MXR34, has entered phase I clinical study against liver cancer, implying their potential application in cancer therapy. According to amounts of original data, this chapter will review the regulatory roles of TLR signaling, some noncoding RNAs, and several key cytokines in cancer and cancer-related immune response, as well as the clinical cases in cancer therapy based on them.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2016.
All research outputs
#18,461,618
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,316
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,542
of 393,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#284
of 443 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 443 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.