↓ Skip to main content

Comparisons of the efficiency of some promoters in silver birch (Betula pendula)

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Cell Reports, March 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparisons of the efficiency of some promoters in silver birch (Betula pendula)
Published in
Plant Cell Reports, March 1998
DOI 10.1007/s002990050406
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Keinonen-Mettälä, A. Pappinen, K. von Weissenberg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 33%
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 80%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell Reports
#862
of 2,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,080
of 31,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell Reports
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,409 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.