You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What is the exact definition of stone dust? An in vitro evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Urology, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00345-020-03178-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Etienne Xavier Keller, Vincent De Coninck, Steeve Doizi, Michel Daudon, Olivier Traxer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 13% |
| France | 3 | 13% |
| Brazil | 2 | 9% |
| Italy | 2 | 9% |
| Chile | 2 | 9% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Panama | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 26% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 22% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 52% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,679,768
of 23,204,238 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#82
of 2,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,626
of 373,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#6
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,204,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.