You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Targeted Microinjection of Synthetic mRNAs to Alter Retina Gene Expression in Xenopus Embryos.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 6 |
| Book title |
Retinal Development
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-61779-848-1_6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-61779-847-4, 978-1-61779-848-1
|
| Authors |
Sally A. Moody, Moody, Sally A. |
| Abstract |
The individual cells of the Xenopus cleavage-stage embryo have been fate mapped, revealing which of these cells contribute to the retina. Using this retina fate map, one can specifically modulate levels of gene expression in retina lineages to determine the function of proteins in various aspects of early retinal development, such as formation of the eye fields and determination of specific cell fates. This chapter presents the techniques for identifying specific retina blastomere precursor cells, and injecting them with lineage tracers, mRNAs encoding wild-type and mutant constructs or morpholino antisense oligonucleotides to alter gene expression. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 50% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
| Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2012.
All research outputs
#14,146,599
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,147
of 13,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,435
of 244,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#244
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.