You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Efficient Algorithms for k-Terminal Cuts on Planar Graphs
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 29 |
| Book title |
Algorithms and Computation
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/3-540-45678-3_29 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-042985-2, 978-3-54-045678-0
|
| Authors |
Danny Z. Chen, Xiaodong Wu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 60% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 3 | 60% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2011.
All research outputs
#12,856,520
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#3,773
of 8,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,378
of 113,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.