You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
GTP Supertrees from Unrooted Gene Trees: Linear Time Algorithms for NNI Based Local Searches
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 11 |
| Book title |
Bioinformatics Research and Applications
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-30191-9_11 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-230190-2, 978-3-64-230191-9
|
| Authors |
Paweł Górecki, J. Gordon Burleigh, Oliver Eulenstein |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 67% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2012.
All research outputs
#15,243,549
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#4,645
of 8,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,131
of 244,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#268
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.