↓ Skip to main content

Xenotransplantation

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Xenotransplantation'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Xenotransplantation: an overview of the field.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Cloning and expression analyses of pig genes.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Basic Analyses of Proteins of Interest for Xenotransplantation
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Studies on Carbohydrate Xenoantigens
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Xenoantibodies and Complement Activity Determinations in Pig-to-Primate Xenotransplantation
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Studies on Coagulation Incompatibilities for Xenotransplantation
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Cellular Studies for In Vitro Modeling of Xenogeneic Immune Responses
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Production of Transgenic and Knockout Pigs by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Small Animal Models of Xenotransplantation
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Heart Xenotransplantation in Primate Models
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Xenogeneic Lung Transplantation Models
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Thymic Transplantation in Pig-to-Nonhuman Primates for the Induction of Tolerance Across Xenogeneic Barriers
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Isolation of Porcine Pancreatic Islets for Xenotransplantation
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Pig Neural Cells Derived from Foetal Mesencephalon as Cell Source for Intracerebral Xenotransplantation
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Hepatocyte Xenotransplantation
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 In Vitro Repair Model of Focal Articular Cartilage Defects in Humans
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Potential Zoonotic Infection of Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus in Xenotransplantation
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Ethical and Regulatory Issues for Clinical Trials in Xenotransplantation
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Some Ethical, Social, and Legal Considerations of Xenotransplantation
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Erratum: In Vitro Repair Model of Focal Articular Cartilage Defects in Humans
Attention for Chapter 2: Cloning and expression analyses of pig genes.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Cloning and expression analyses of pig genes.
Chapter number 2
Book title
Xenotransplantation
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-845-0_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61779-844-3, 978-1-61779-845-0
Authors

Mireia Uribe-Herranz, Cristina Costa, Uribe-Herranz, Mireia, Costa, Cristina

Abstract

Understanding the molecular bases of xenograft rejection is one of the highest priorities in the xenotransplantation field. Furthermore, the identification of physiological incompatibilities in the xenogeneic setting is also necessary for developing the appropriate strategies to have a long-term functioning xenograft. As the pig is the species of choice for the development of xenogeneic applications, the cloning of pig genes or cDNA is a key step to elucidate the interactions of pig and human molecules. It also provides the necessary information for assessing the level of mRNA expression of relevant proteins in tissues and organs of interest for xenotransplantation. In most cases, the cloning of the cDNA is sufficient to attain these goals. Thus, we describe a basic cloning method that comprises total RNA extraction, reverse transcription (RT), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. We also include some links for databases and bioinformatic tools available in the Internet for the subsequent analyses and predictions. Finally, we recommend and explain the procedures of northern blotting and quantitative RT-PCR for conducting the mRNA expression studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Social Sciences 1 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,773
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,815
of 13,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,924
of 244,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#325
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,025 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.