↓ Skip to main content

Lesser Known Large dsDNA Viruses

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Jumbo bacteriophages.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Jumbo bacteriophages.
Chapter number 7
Book title
Lesser Known Large dsDNA Viruses
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-68618-7_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-068617-0, 978-3-54-068618-7
Authors

Hendrix, R W, R. W. Hendrix, Hendrix, R. W.

Abstract

There is currently a handful of genome sequences available for tailed bacteriophages with genomes of more than 200 kbp of DNA, designated here as giant or jumbo phages. The majority of the proteins predicted from the genome sequences of these phages have no matches in the current sequence databases, and the genomes themselves are diverse enough to preclude the sorts of detailed comparative analysis that has benefited study of the smaller phages, for which hundreds of genome sequences are available. However, it is informative to extrapolate the better known genome organizations and mechanisms of evolution seen in the smaller phages to the jumbo phages. In this way, we see that the jumbo phages encode the same functions as the smaller phages, supplemented with large numbers of mostly small genes of mostly undiscovered functions. A case can be made that the jumbo phages evolved from smaller tailed phages, possibly in a process mediated by the constraints imposed on genome size by capsid size.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Colombia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 74 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 26%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 8%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2016.
All research outputs
#18,455,405
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#528
of 679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,926
of 169,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#20
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.