You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Manipulating Tournaments in Cup and Round Robin Competitions
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 3 |
Book title |
Algorithmic Decision Theory
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-04428-1_3 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-204427-4, 978-3-64-204428-1
|
Authors |
Russell, Tyrel, Walsh, Toby, Tyrel Russell, Toby Walsh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 25% |
Researcher | 2 | 17% |
Professor | 2 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 6 | 50% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 8% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2012.
All research outputs
#5,566,256
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#1,768
of 8,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,708
of 168,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#34
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.