You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
The phylogenetic distribution and evolutionary origins of endocannabinoid signalling
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2005
Elphick MR, Egertová M, Elphick, M. R., Egertová, M., M. R. Elphick, M. Egertová
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||15||20%|
|Student > Bachelor||12||16%|
|Student > Master||7||9%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||5||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||26||35%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||13||17%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||5||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,081,774 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
of 664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 145,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,081,774 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.