You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characterization, description, and considerations for the use of funding acknowledgement data in Web of Science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-016-1953-y |
| Authors |
Adèle Paul-Hus, Nadine Desrochers, Rodrigo Costas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Sweden | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 20% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Librarian | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 24% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 32 | 36% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 8% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,739,425
of 23,907,431 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#336
of 2,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,512
of 301,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#8
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,907,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.