↓ Skip to main content

Lung Cancer and Personalized Medicine

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Lung Cancer Statistics.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
patent
1 patent
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1519 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Lung Cancer Statistics.
Chapter number 1
Book title
Lung Cancer and Personalized Medicine
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-24223-1_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-924221-7, 978-3-31-924223-1
Authors

Lindsey A. Torre, Rebecca L. Siegel, Ahmedin Jemal, Torre, Lindsey A, Siegel, Rebecca L, Jemal, Ahmedin, Torre, Lindsey A., Siegel, Rebecca L.

Editors

Aamir Ahmad, Shirish Gadgeel

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among both men and women in the United States. It is also the leading cause of cancer death among men and the second leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. Lung cancer rates and trends vary substantially by sex, age, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geography because of differences in historical smoking patterns. Lung cancer mortality rates in the United States are highest among males, blacks, people of lower socioeconomic status, and in the mid-South (e.g., Kentucky, Mississippi, Arkansas, and Tennessee). Globally, rates are highest in countries where smoking uptake began earliest, such as those in North America and Europe. Although rates are now decreasing in most of these countries (e.g., United States, United Kingdom, Australia), especially in men, they are increasing in countries where smoking uptake occurred later. Low- and middle-income countries now account for more than 50 % of lung cancer deaths each year. This chapter reviews lung cancer incidence and mortality patterns in the United States and globally.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,519 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 1515 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 283 19%
Student > Master 197 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 143 9%
Researcher 123 8%
Student > Postgraduate 65 4%
Other 165 11%
Unknown 543 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 342 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 189 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 69 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 60 4%
Other 218 14%
Unknown 575 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#548,054
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#55
of 4,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,271
of 391,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#10
of 418 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 418 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.