↓ Skip to main content

Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2016

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2016'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Parameterized Compilation Lower Bounds for Restricted CNF-Formulas
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Satisfiability via Smooth Pictures
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Solution-Graphs of Boolean Formulas and Isomorphism
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Strong Backdoors for Default Logic
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The Normalized Autocorrelation Length of Random Max  \(r\) -Sat Converges in Probability to \((1-1/2^r)/r\)
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Tight Upper Bound on Splitting by Linear Combinations for Pigeonhole Principle
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Extreme Cases in SAT Problems
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Improved Static Symmetry Breaking for SAT
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Learning Rate Based Branching Heuristic for SAT Solvers
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 On the Hardness of SAT with Community Structure
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Trade-offs Between Time and Memory in a Tighter Model of CDCL SAT Solvers
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 A SAT Approach to Branchwidth
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Computing Maximum Unavoidable Subgraphs Using SAT Solvers
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Heuristic NPN Classification for Large Functions Using AIGs and LEXSAT
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Solving and Verifying the Boolean Pythagorean Triples Problem via Cube-and-Conquer
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Deciding Bit-Vector Formulas with mcSAT
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Solving Quantified Bit-Vector Formulas Using Binary Decision Diagrams
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Speeding up the Constraint-Based Method in Difference Logic
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Synthesis of Domain Specific CNF Encoders for Bit-Vector Solvers
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Finding Finite Models in Multi-sorted First-Order Logic
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 MCS Extraction with Sublinear Oracle Queries
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Predicate Elimination for Preprocessing in First-Order Theorem Proving
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Incremental Determinization
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Non-prenex QBF Solving Using Abstraction
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 On Q-Resolution and CDCL QBF Solving
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 On Stronger Calculi for QBFs
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Q-Resolution with Generalized Axioms
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 2QBF: Challenges and Solutions
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Dependency Schemes for DQBF
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Lifting QBF Resolution Calculi to DQBF
  32. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 Long Distance Q-Resolution with Dependency Schemes
  33. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 32 BEACON: An Efficient SAT-Based Tool for Debugging \({\mathcal {EL}}{^+}\) Ontologies
  34. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 33 HordeQBF: A Modular and Massively Parallel QBF Solver
  35. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 34 LMHS: A SAT-IP Hybrid MaxSAT Solver
  36. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 35 OpenSMT2: An SMT Solver for Multi-core and Cloud Computing
  37. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 36 SpyBug: Automated Bug Detection in the Configuration Space of SAT Solvers
Attention for Chapter 33: HordeQBF: A Modular and Massively Parallel QBF Solver
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
HordeQBF: A Modular and Massively Parallel QBF Solver
Chapter number 33
Book title
Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2016
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-40970-2_33
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-940969-6, 978-3-31-940970-2
Authors

Tomas Balyo, Florian Lonsing, Tomáš Balyo

Editors

Nadia Creignou, Daniel Le Berre

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,451,892
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#6,012
of 8,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,228
of 349,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#241
of 348 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 348 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.