You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Method for Evaluating Neuromodulatory Properties of Dental Pulp Stem Cell as an In Vitro Model for Parkinson's Disease.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 261 |
Book title |
Stem Cell Nanotechnology
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/7651_2019_261 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-160359-8, 978-1-07-160360-4
|
Authors |
Gnanasegaran, Nareshwaran, Thimiri Govinda Raj, Deepak B, Arumugam, Sivakumar, Nareshwaran Gnanasegaran, Deepak B. Thimiri Govinda Raj, Sivakumar Arumugam, Thimiri Govinda Raj, Deepak B. |
Abstract |
Several research groups have utilized dental pulp stem cells for numerous studies as treatment modality for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the roles of dental pulp stem cells in governing the Parkinson's disease inflammatory microenvironment remain to be evaluated. In this article, we elaborate the method where we can investigate the effects of dental pulp stem cells on neurons and microglia in an in vitro inflammatory microenvironment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 31% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 15% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 15% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 23% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2019.
All research outputs
#18,689,206
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#8,032
of 13,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,496
of 340,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#52
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.