You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Sorting shuffled monotone sequences
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 88 |
| Book title |
SWAT 90
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1007/3-540-52846-6_88 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-052846-3, 978-3-54-047164-6
|
| Authors |
Christos Levcopoulos, Ola Petersson, Levcopoulos, Christos, Petersson, Ola |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2012.
All research outputs
#12,853,567
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#3,773
of 8,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,301
of 57,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them