↓ Skip to main content

Cryo-electron microscopy: an introduction to the technique, and considerations when working to establish a national facility

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cryo-electron microscopy: an introduction to the technique, and considerations when working to establish a national facility
Published in
Biophysical Reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12551-019-00571-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Bhella

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 18%
Student > Bachelor 31 18%
Student > Master 24 14%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 51 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 11%
Chemistry 18 10%
Materials Science 9 5%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 58 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,535,210
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#126
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,791
of 346,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.