↓ Skip to main content

Exclusionary Rules in Comparative Law

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Exclusionary Rules in Comparative Law'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 The United States: The Rise and Fall of the Constitutional Exclusionary Rule
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Ireland: A Move to Categorical Exclusion?
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Scotland: A Plea for Consistency
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Israel: The Supreme Court’s New, Cautious Exclusionary Rule
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Germany: Balancing Truth Against Protected Constitutional Interests
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 France: Procedural Nullities and Exclusion
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Belgium: From Categorical Nullities to a Judicially Created Balancing Test
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 The Netherlands: Statutory Balancing and a Choice of Remedies
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Spain: The Constitutional Court’s Move from Categorical Exclusion to Limited Balancing
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Italy: Statutory Nullities and Non-usability
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Greece: From Statutory Nullities to a Categorical Statutory Exclusionary Rule
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Turkey: The Move to Categorical Exclusion of Illegally Gathered Evidence
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Serbia: Courts Struggle with a New Categorical Statutory Exclusionary Rule
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 England and Wales: Fair Trial Analysis and the Presumed Admissibility of Physical Evidence
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Taiwan: The Codification of a Judicially-Made Discretionary Exclusionary Rule
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 The European Court of Human Rights: The Fair Trial Analysis Under Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Balancing Truth Against Human Rights: A Theory of Modern Exclusionary Rules
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exclusionary Rules in Comparative Law
Published by
Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5348-8
ISBNs
978-9-40-075347-1, 978-9-40-075348-8, 978-9-40-079849-6
Authors

Beernaert, Marie-Aude , Traest, Philip

Editors

Stephen C. Thaman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Master 4 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 19%
Researcher 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 50%
Arts and Humanities 2 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,785,110
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,865
of 292,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them