↓ Skip to main content

Cellular Automata and Discrete Complex Systems

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 15: Cellular Automata on Group Sets and the Uniform Curtis-Hedlund-Lyndon Theorem
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Cellular Automata on Group Sets and the Uniform Curtis-Hedlund-Lyndon Theorem
Chapter number 15
Book title
Cellular Automata and Discrete Complex Systems
Published in
arXiv, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39300-1_15
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-939299-8, 978-3-31-939300-1
Authors

Simon Wacker, Wacker, Simon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2016.
All research outputs
#16,821,304
of 25,515,042 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#310,630
of 924,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,145
of 368,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#3,676
of 13,012 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,515,042 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924,684 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13,012 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.