You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
A Quantitative Study of Accuracies in Positions of Star Markers on Historical Astrolabes
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 3 |
| Book title |
The Growth and Development of Astronomy and Astrophysics in India and the Asia-Pacific Region
|
| Published in |
ADS, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-981-13-3645-4_3 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-9-81-133644-7, 978-9-81-133645-4
|
| Authors |
Nandivada Rathnasree, Patrick Das Gupta, Anurag Garg, Rathnasree, Nandivada, Das Gupta, Patrick, Garg, Anurag |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,594,029
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#9,347
of 37,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,210
of 350,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#6
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,543 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.