↓ Skip to main content

High Content Screening

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Pathway mapping tools for analysis of high content data.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Pathway mapping tools for analysis of high content data.
Book title
High Content Screening
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, September 2006
DOI 10.1385/1-59745-217-3:319
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-58829-731-0, 978-1-59745-217-5
Authors

Ekins S, Nikolsky Y, Bugrim A, Kirillov E, Nikolskaya T, Sean Ekins, Yuri Nikolsky, Andrej Bugrim, Eugene Kirillov, Tatiana Nikolskaya, Ekins, Sean, Nikolsky, Yuri, Bugrim, Andrej, Kirillov, Eugene, Nikolskaya, Tatiana

Abstract

The complexity of human biology requires a systems approach that uses computational approaches to integrate different data types. Systems biology encompasses the complete biological system of metabolic and signaling pathways, which can be assessed by measuring global gene expression, protein content, metabolic profiles, and individual genetic, clinical, and phenotypic data. High content screening assays can also be used to generate systems biology knowledge. In this review, we will summarize the pathway databases and describe biological network tools used predominantly with this genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data but which are equally as applicable for high content screening data analysis. We describe in detail the integrated data-mining tools applicable to building biological networks developed by GeneGo, namely, MetaCore and MetaDrug.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 7%
Malaysia 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 88 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 23%
Student > Master 11 11%
Professor 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Computer Science 7 7%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 13 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2012.
All research outputs
#3,744,099
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#952
of 13,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,051
of 67,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them