↓ Skip to main content

Fun with Algorithms

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Fun with Algorithms'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Fun with Olympiad in Algorithmics
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The FUNnest Talks That belong to FUN (Abstract)
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Fun with Games
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Do We Need a Stack to Erase a Component in a Binary Image?
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Kaboozle Is NP-complete, Even in a Strip
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 A Hat Trick
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Fun at a Department Store: Data Mining Meets Switching Theory
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Using Cell Phone Keyboards Is ( $\mathcal{NP}$ ) Hard
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Urban Hitchhiking
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 A Fun Application of Compact Data Structures to Indexing Geographic Data
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 On Table Arrangements, Scrabble Freaks, and Jumbled Pattern Matching
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Cryptographic and Physical Zero-Knowledge Proof: From Sudoku to Nonogram
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 A Better Bouncer’s Algorithm
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Tradeoffs in Process Strategy Games with Application in the WDM Reconfiguration Problem
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 UNO Is Hard, Even for a Single Player
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Leveling-Up in Heroes of Might and Magic III
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 The Magic of a Number System
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Bit-(Parallelism) 2 : Getting to the Next Level of Parallelism
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 An Algorithmic Analysis of the Honey-Bee Game
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Mapping an Unfriendly Subway System
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Cracking Bank PINs by Playing Mastermind
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Computational Complexity of Two-Dimensional Platform Games
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Christmas Gift Exchange Games
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Return of the Boss Problem: Competing Online against a Non-adaptive Adversary
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Fun with Algorithms
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 The Computational Complexity of RaceTrack
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Simple Wriggling Is Hard Unless You Are a Fat Hippo
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 UNO is hard, even for a single player
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Fighting Censorship with Algorithms
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 The Complexity of Flood Filling Games
  32. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 The Computational Complexity of the Kakuro Puzzle, Revisited
  33. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 32 Symmetric Monotone Venn Diagrams with Seven Curves
  34. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 33 The Feline Josephus Problem
  35. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 34 Scheduling with Bully Selfish Jobs
  36. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 35 O(1)-Time Unsorting by Prefix-Reversals in a Boustrophedon Linked List
Attention for Chapter 15: UNO Is Hard, Even for a Single Player
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
58 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
UNO Is Hard, Even for a Single Player
Chapter number 15
Book title
Fun with Algorithms
Published in
ADS, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-13122-6_15
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-213121-9, 978-3-64-213122-6
Authors

Erik D. Demaine, Martin L. Demaine, Ryuhei Uehara, Takeaki Uno, Yushi Uno, Demaine, Erik D., Demaine, Martin L., Uehara, Ryuhei, Uno, Takeaki, Uno, Yushi

Editors

Paolo Boldi, Luisa Gargano

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,000,887
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#293
of 26,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,762
of 174,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#4
of 617 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 617 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.