You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
I-SceI-Based Assays to Examine Distinct Repair Outcomes of Mammalian Chromosomal Double Strand Breaks.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 27 |
| Book title |
DNA Repair Protocols
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-61779-998-3_27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-61779-997-6, 978-1-61779-998-3
|
| Authors |
Gunn A, Stark JM, Gunn, Amanda, Stark, Jeremy M., Amanda Gunn, Jeremy M. Stark |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 30% |
| Researcher | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 61 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 31 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,362,987
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,349
of 13,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,713
of 244,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#265
of 474 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 474 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.