↓ Skip to main content

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase in Health and Disease

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 68: Oncogenic mutations of PIK3CA in human cancers.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 690)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Oncogenic mutations of PIK3CA in human cancers.
Chapter number 68
Book title
Phosphoinositide 3-kinase in Health and Disease
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/82_2010_68
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-214815-6, 978-3-64-214816-3
Authors

Samuels, Yardena, Waldman, Todd, Yardena Samuels, Todd Waldman

Abstract

The involvement of the PIK3CA gene product p110α, the catalytic subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), in human cancer has been suggested for over 15 years, and support for this proposal had been provided by both genetic and functional studies, including most recently the discovery of common activating missense mutations of PIK3CA in a wide variety of common human tumor types. This chapter will focus on the discovery of these mutations and describes their relevance to a wide range of common human tumor types.Of note, the identification and functional analysis of the PIK3CA gene are reviewed in other chapters in this book. However, a brief mention will be made here of its general properties as background to our focus on the discovery of its cancer-specific mutations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Student > Master 5 5%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 33 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Chemistry 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 34 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,655,018
of 23,968,814 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#45
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,526
of 169,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,968,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.