You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Analysis of the Murine Bone Marrow Hematopoietic System Using Mass and Flow Cytometry
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 12 |
| Book title |
Mass Cytometry
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-9454-0_12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-9453-3, 978-1-4939-9454-0
|
| Authors |
Thomas M. Ashhurst, Darren A. Cox, Adrian L. Smith, Nicholas J. C. King, Ashhurst, Thomas M., Cox, Darren A., Smith, Adrian L., King, Nicholas J. C. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 29% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2020.
All research outputs
#14,449,295
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,259
of 13,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,546
of 350,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#18
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,275 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.