You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Model-Driven Tile Size Selection for DOACROSS Loops on GPUs
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 40 |
| Book title |
Euro-Par 2011 Parallel Processing
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-23397-5_40 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-223396-8, 978-3-64-223397-5
|
| Authors |
Di, Peng, Xue, Jingling, Peng Di, Jingling Xue |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 60% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 8 | 80% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,835,254
of 23,767,404 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,496
of 8,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,967
of 185,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#75
of 316 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,767,404 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 316 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.