↓ Skip to main content

Conceptual Change in Biology

Overview of attention for book
Conceptual Change in Biology
Springer Netherlands

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Conceptual Change and Evolutionary Developmental Biology
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Adaptive Aspects of Development: A 30-Year Perspective on the Relevance of Biomechanical and Allometric Analyses
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Do Functional Requirements for Embryos and Larvae Have a Place in Evo-devo?
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Is Heterochrony Still an Effective Paradigm for Contemporary Studies of Evo-devo?
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Homoplasy, a Moving Target
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 The Concept of Phenotypic Plasticity and the Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity in Life History Traits
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 A Developmental-Physiological Perspective on the Development and Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Cellular Basis of Morphogenetic Change: Looking Back after 30 Years of Progress on Developmental Signaling Pathways
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 The Road to Facilitated Variation
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Phyla, Phylogeny, and Embryonic Body Plans
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Evo-devo and the Evolution of Marine Larvae: From the Modern World to the Dawn of the Metazoa
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Dahlem 1981: Before and Beyond
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 What Salamander Biologists Have Taught Us About Evo-devo
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 From Developmental Constraint to Evolvability: How Concepts Figure in Explanation and Disciplinary Identity
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Reinventing the Organism: Evolvability and Homology in Post-Dahlem Evolutionary Biology
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Internal Factors in Evolution: The Morphogenetic Tree, Developmental Bias, and Some Thoughts on the Conceptual Structure of Evo-devo
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Conceptual Change in Biology
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Hierarchies and Integration in Evolution and Development
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Development and Evolution: The Physics Connection
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 The Interaction of Research Systems in the Evo-devo Juncture
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Evo-devo as a Trading Zone
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 128)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conceptual Change in Biology
Published by
Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9412-1
ISBNs
978-9-40-179411-4, 978-9-40-179412-1, 978-9-40-240561-3
Editors

Alan C. Love

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 93 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 26%
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 10%
Philosophy 6 6%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 11 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,516,044
of 26,222,667 outputs
Outputs from Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
#8
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,165
of 362,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,222,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.