You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
A Molecular Phylogenetic Framework for Timothy (Phleum pratense L.) Improvement
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 9 |
| Book title |
Molecular Breeding for Sustainable Crop Improvement
|
| Published in |
Sustainable Development and Biodiversity, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-27090-6_9 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-927088-3, 978-3-31-927090-6
|
| Authors |
Alan V. Stewart, Nicholas W. Ellison |
| Editors |
Vijay Rani Rajpal, S. Rama Rao, S.N. Raina |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2016.
All research outputs
#4,978,515
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Sustainable Development and Biodiversity
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,371
of 408,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainable Development and Biodiversity
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them