↓ Skip to main content

Cancer Epidemiology

Overview of attention for book
Cancer Epidemiology
Humana Press

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors for Lung Cancer
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Lifestyle, genes, and cancer.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Energy balance, physical activity, and cancer risk.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Genetic Epidemiology Studies in Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Parental Smoking and Childhood Leukemia
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Lung Cancer and Exposure to Metals: The Epidemiological Evidence
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Breast Cancer and the Role of Exercise in Women
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Energy intake, physical activity, energy balance, and cancer: epidemiologic evidence.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Contribution of Alcohol and Tobacco Use in Gastrointestinal Cancer Development
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Role of Xenobiotic Metabolic Enzymes in Cancer Epidemiology
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Genetic Polymorphisms in the Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Pathways and Breast Cancer Risk and Survival
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Molecular Epidemiology of DNA Repair Genes in Bladder Cancer
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Breast Cancer Screening and Biomarkers
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Epidemiology of Brain Tumors
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Mammographic density: a heritable risk factor for breast cancer.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Acquired risk factors for colorectal cancer.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Cancer Epidemiology
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Determinants of Incidence of Primary Fallopian Tube Carcinoma (PFTC)
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 The Changing Epidemiology of Lung Cancer
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Epidemiology of Ovarian Cancer
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Epidemiology, Pathology, and Genetics of Prostate Cancer Among African Americans Compared with Other Ethnicities
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Racial Differences in Clinical Outcome After Prostate Cancer Treatment
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Epidemiology of stomach cancer.
Attention for Chapter 15: Mammographic density: a heritable risk factor for breast cancer.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Mammographic density: a heritable risk factor for breast cancer.
Chapter number 15
Book title
Cancer Epidemiology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60327-492-0_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60327-491-3, 978-1-60327-492-0
Authors

Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Rommens JM, Paterson AD, Minkin S, Yaffe MJ, Stone J, Hopper JL, Boyd, Norman F., Martin, Lisa J., Rommens, Johanna M., Paterson, Andrew D., Minkin, Salomon, Yaffe, Martin J., Stone, Jennifer, Hopper, John L., Norman F. Boyd, Lisa J. Martin, Johanna M. Rommens, Andrew D. Paterson, Salomon Minkin, Martin J. Yaffe, Jennifer Stone, John L. Hopper

Editors

Mukesh Verma PhD

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 87 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Researcher 14 16%
Other 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Psychology 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 24 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,965,037
of 26,603,725 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#262
of 14,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,030
of 190,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#8
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,603,725 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,516 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.