↓ Skip to main content

Applied Molecular Genetics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Intracellular lytic enzyme systems and their use for disruption of Escherichia coli.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 224)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Intracellular lytic enzyme systems and their use for disruption of Escherichia coli.
Book title
Applied Molecular Genetics
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, January 1990
DOI 10.1007/bfb0009077
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-052794-7, 978-3-54-047151-6
Authors

Dabora, R L, Cooney, C L, R. L. Dabora, C. L. Cooney, Dabora, R. L., Cooney, C. L.

Abstract

This article focusses on lytic enzyme systems available in E. coli and their potential use for cellular disruption. In the systems described here the genetic information for lysis would be carried within the microbial host, either integrated or naturally occurring on chromosomal DNA, or on extrachromosomal elements such as plasmids. Each microbe would carry complete information for endogenous enzymatic lysis, and lysis would occur in a controlled manner after being triggered by an external factor such as temperature or inducer addition. The lytic systems explored in this review include the autolytic enzymes, colicin lytic enzymes, and bacteriophage lytic enzymes from phage phiX174, T4, lambda, MS2 and Q beta. Many of the colicin lytic enzymes and all of the bacteriophage lytic enzymes described here have been cloned, and in some instances examined as cellular disruption methods. None of the E. coli autolytic enzymes have been cloned, but information pertinent for use as a disruption method is described.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 33%
Other 1 17%
Librarian 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Chemical Engineering 1 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,710,483
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#31
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,184
of 58,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them