↓ Skip to main content

Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Modeling the Internet
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Transformation-Based Parallelization of Request-Processing Applications
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Embedded Software Development with Projectional Language Workbenches
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Concern-Based (de)composition of Model-Driven Software Development Processes
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Flexible Model Element Introduction Policies for Aspect-Oriented Modeling
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Role-Based Generic Model Refactoring
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Precise Detection of Conflicting Change Operations Using Process Model Terms
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Capturing the Intention of Model Changes
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Selective and Consistent Undoing of Model Changes
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Modeling Features at Runtime
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Inferring Meta-models for Runtime System Data from the Clients of Management APIs
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 A Meta Model for Artefact-Orientation: Fundamentals and Lessons Learned in Requirements Engineering
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 A Common Framework for Synchronization in Requirements Modelling Languages
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 A Systematic Review of the Use of Requirements Engineering Techniques in Model-Driven Development
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Slicing of UML Models Using Model Transformations
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 An Adjustable Transformation from OWL to Ecore
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Transforming Process Models: Executable Rewrite Rules versus a Formalized Java Program
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Disciplined Heterogeneous Modeling
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Design Guidelines for the Development of Quality-Driven Model Transformations
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Early Deviation Detection in Modeling Activities of MDE Processes
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Artifact or Process Guidance, an Empirical Study
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Scaling Up Model Driven Engineering – Experience and Lessons Learnt
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Mod4J: A Qualitative Case Study of Model-Driven Software Development
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Modeling Issues: a Survival Guide for a Non-expert Modeler
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Monarch: Model-Based Development of Software Architectures
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Model-to-Metamodel Transformation for the Development of Component-Based Systems
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Architectural Descriptions as Boundary Objects in System and Design Work
Attention for Chapter 19: Transforming Process Models: Executable Rewrite Rules versus a Formalized Java Program
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Transforming Process Models: Executable Rewrite Rules versus a Formalized Java Program
Chapter number 19
Book title
Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-16129-2_19
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-216128-5, 978-3-64-216129-2
Authors

Pieter Van Gorp, Rik Eshuis, Van Gorp, Pieter, Eshuis, Rik

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 5%
China 1 5%
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 18 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 38%
Student > Master 4 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 17 81%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2021.
All research outputs
#15,241,801
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#4,645
of 8,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,997
of 163,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#98
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.