You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society [IEHS])—Part 2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-013-3171-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Bittner, J. Bingener-Casey, U. Dietz, M. Fabian, G. S. Ferzli, R. H. Fortelny, F. Köckerling, J. Kukleta, K. LeBlanc, D. Lomanto, M. C. Misra, S. Morales-Conde, B. Ramshaw, W. Reinpold, S. Rim, M. Rohr, R. Schrittwieser, Th. Simon, M. Smietanski, B. Stechemesser, M. Timoney, P. Chowbey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Turkey | 2 | 12% |
| Yemen | 1 | 6% |
| Libya | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 41% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 24% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 24% |
| Unknown | 24 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 56% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 29 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,243,164
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#555
of 7,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,872
of 228,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#7
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.